<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Netscape 8.0 &#8212; stupidly irrelevant</title>
	<link>http://cleverhack.com/2005/05/20/netscape-80-stupidly-irrelevant/</link>
	<description>Technology, Startups, Internet Marketing</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 09:42:10 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: arcatan</title>
		<link>http://cleverhack.com/2005/05/20/netscape-80-stupidly-irrelevant/#comment-1514</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 May 2005 05:49:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://cleverhack.com/2005/05/20/netscape-80-stupidly-irrelevant/#comment-1514</guid>
					<description>I'm just wondering as if they're using Firefox 1.0.3 in Netscape 8.0, if they still have this very critical security hole, which is fixed in 1.0.4..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m just wondering as if they&#8217;re using Firefox 1.0.3 in Netscape 8.0, if they still have this very critical security hole, which is fixed in 1.0.4..
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>

